When writing the preginn minute dwas under the impression that the Bill wont hav rejected before this deipalit
then passed could te ausured
-but on top leadWher
the papers again I father that the mounding with the Bill may net imperbeth han her suspended.
I would therefore and to what is prepend
"but that Land Resen consider
in that menate
that this an in which the wh
humen and ounpeirs
the wharves
I heard by Counsel and that of
L
to
a
Oration
enght 5
A
fee
defend the standing sees and the official the Grosses
aders for that perfore.
thath made.
member the day. Cumide shent consent to it
Jagree with Mr Wingfile.
Clearly Johmed say this was a
cape in while in wonde
polited
to allow a braving
as
if tebiically
soon if
arted, soon
it would be sacluded by the
Standing orders.
Run 79
I concur. The fovernor's ruling seems tone
He latter parr g I suppose, also
to
there wrong.
Despard. would be, Communicated & to Petitioners? It
shues be think.
J.B.6/5.
Jum surprized offical trial the Standing Orders do not contain a paragraph making the God's ruling final If thing hard. I should have had nothing I must aba
kely do not contain such co
But as
tout it
as brce that this God.
Aula does Corral
under
334
was wrongly advised and hist
Flanding
Order 52 – But too balti
should be dealt with dedicated
he.
Luk
in the way pupired
wringfield – I do not mint that ten last.
§
paragraphs of the Governors despolite staruld be com.
Let me zen time chapte
ummated &tru Peletioners
1.679.
W. Bramitin
qu Isubmit draft in the
prope
dluse
which
meant
Av
Junderstand is intended by Lord Rifin. §. I think W. Buxton probably that the last part of Bonggest Secretary of states despatch (wxz. the part marked to in Md. Wingpildi minute should be comm
umicated
at and of
to the Petitimers? I have inserted
words accordingly for can
my draft.
Jay13/
1679
Ah 79
the doubt the above is the correct interpretation of
Fr. Burton's remont
71719
?
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.